Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 14, 2021

Fulton v. Capra

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-00339
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Fulton v. Capra, Chief Judge McMahon ordered prisoner Fulton to pay fees or submit authorization within 30 days.

Who this affects

Alvin Fulton, a prisoner representing himself, must either pay the filing fees or submit the required prisoner authorization within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Fulton v. Capra, Alvin Fulton, who is incarcerated and representing himself, submitted an application to proceed without paying the filing fees but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

The court gave Fulton 30 days to either pay $402 in fees or submit the authorization. The authorization would allow installment payments to be deducted from his prison account and would provide the court with six months of account statements.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk to mail Fulton the order and said no summons would issue yet. The court stated that the case would be processed if Fulton complied and would be dismissed if he did not; it also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fulton v. Capra · No. 1:21-cv-00339
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 14, 2021

Background

Alvin Fulton, who was incarcerated at Greene Correctional Facility and proceeding without a lawyer, filed this civil action against Michael Capra and other defendants. Fulton submitted an application to proceed without prepayment of fees, commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis, but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Fee and Authorization Requirements

The court explained that a prisoner bringing a civil action must either pay $402 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying the fees. If the court grants that request, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The prisoner authorization permits the correctional facility to deduct those payments and requires certified account statements for the previous six months to be sent to the court. The $52 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court ordered Fulton to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay the $402 in fees or submit the attached prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 21-CV-0339 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail Fulton a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the action would be processed under the Clerk's procedures if Fulton complied and would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed time.

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a statutory “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which can limit a prisoner's ability to proceed without prepaying fees in future cases.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.