Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 15, 2021

Garcia v. West Chester District Attorney Office

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:21-cv-00348
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Garcia v. WestecHester County District Attorney Office, Judge McMahon ordered Garcia to pay fees or submit prisoner forms within 30 days.

Who this affects

Jason Garcia, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the required prisoner forms within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Garcia v. WestecHester County District Attorney Office, Jason Garcia filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting completed forms to proceed without prepayment. The order says Garcia is incarcerated and represented himself.

The court gave Garcia 30 days to either pay $402 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment and a prisoner authorization. That authorization would allow installment deductions from his account for the filing fee.

Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk to mail the order to Garcia and said no summons would issue yet. The court stated that the case would proceed if Garcia complied and would be dismissed if he did not; it also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia v. West Chester District Attorney Office · No. 1:21-cv-00348
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Jan. 15, 2021

Background

Jason Garcia filed this civil action without paying the required filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepayment of fees or a prisoner authorization. The order states that Garcia was incarcerated at the Orange County Correctional Facility and was representing himself.

Payment or application requirement

The court explained that a prisoner bringing a civil action must either pay $402—the $350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepayment. If that request is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires collection of the $350 filing fee through installment payments deducted from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization also directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and provide certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the preceding six months.

The court ordered Garcia, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $402 or submit the attached application and prisoner authorization. The documents were to identify docket number 21-CV-348 (CM).

Order and effect

The court directed the Clerk to mail Garcia a copy of the order and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Garcia complied. If he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order further cautioned that a later dismissal of a prisoner’s action as frivolous or for failure to state a claim may count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.