Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 20, 2021

Gil-Cabrera v. Department of Corrections

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:20-cv-09493
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Gil-Cabrera v. Department of Corrections, Judge Aaron ordered service of a prisoner’s COVID-19 lawsuit but did not decide its merits.

Who this affects

Ricardo Gil-Cabrera, Patricia Yang, Margaret Egan, and Commissioner Cynthia Brann. The order also directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to take steps concerning service.

What happened

Ricardo Gil-Cabrera, who was incarcerated at the Vernon C. Bain Center, filed this lawsuit without a lawyer under a federal civil-rights law. He alleges that jail officials failed to protect him from contracting COVID-19. The court had allowed him to proceed without paying fees in advance, and he filed a second amended complaint.

The court directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Patricia Yang and Margaret Egan. It also asked Commissioner Cynthia Brann to waive service of the summons. The order did not decide whether Gil-Cabrera’s allegations were legally valid.

Stewart D. Aaron, the United States Magistrate Judge, issued the January 20, 2021 order. The court also instructed Gil-Cabrera to notify it of any address change and directed that he receive a copy of the order and information materials.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gil-Cabrera v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-09493
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 20, 2021

Background

Ricardo Gil-Cabrera, who was incarcerated at the Vernon C. Bain Center, brought a case without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing certain claims against state or local officials for violating constitutional rights. He alleged that jail officials were failing to protect him from contracting COVID-19. The opinion states that the court had previously allowed him to proceed without prepaying fees and that he filed a Second Amended Complaint on January 4, 2021.

Service of the Defendants

Because Gil-Cabrera was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The Clerk of Court was directed to prepare service forms, issue summonses, and provide the necessary papers to the Marshals Service for Patricia Yang and Margaret Egan.

For Defendant Brann, the Clerk was directed to notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department. The court requested that Commissioner Cynthia Brann waive service of the summons.

Other Instructions and Disposition

The court instructed Gil-Cabrera to notify it in writing if his address changes and stated that the action could be dismissed if he failed to do so. The Clerk was also directed to mail him a copy of the order and an information package.

This was an order directing service of the lawsuit. It did not decide the merits of Gil-Cabrera’s claim that jail officials failed to protect him from COVID-19.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.