Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 20, 2021

Chirse v. Macklin

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-00463
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Chirse v. Macklin, Judge McMahon transferred the prisoner’s constitutional-rights case to the Western District of New York because venue was improper.

Who this affects

Devante Chirse and the defendants in his federal civil-rights action; the case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Western District of New York.

What happened

In Chirse v. Macklin, Devante Chirse, who was incarcerated at Southport Correctional Facility, brought a case without a lawyer under a federal civil-rights law, alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights.

The court found that the case did not belong in the Southern District of New York because Chirse did not allege that any defendant lived there or that a substantial part of the events occurred there. The alleged events occurred at Southport, in Chemung County, which is in the Western District of New York.

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the case transferred to the Western District of New York and closed the case in the Southern District of New York. She left the decision about whether Chirse could continue without paying filing fees to the receiving court, directed that no summons issue from her court, and denied fee-free status for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chirse v. Macklin · No. 1:21-cv-00463
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 20, 2021

Background

Devante Chirse, who was incarcerated at Southport Correctional Facility in Pine City, New York, filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that the defendants violated his federal constitutional rights. The opinion does not describe the underlying alleged violations in greater detail.

Venue analysis

Venue is the legally proper federal district for a case. The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), which generally permits a civil action to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, if neither applies, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority for the case.

The court concluded that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York because Chirse did not allege that any defendant resided there or that a substantial part of the events or omissions occurred there. Chirse alleged that the events occurred at Southport. The court determined that Southport is in Chemung County, which lies in the Western District of New York.

Ruling

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The order closed the case in the Southern District of New York. It also stated that the receiving court would decide whether Chirse could proceed without prepaying fees, directed that no summons issue from the Southern District of New York, and denied fee-free status for an appeal because the court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The opinion does not decide the merits of Chirse’s constitutional-rights allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.