Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 22, 2021

Garcia Salvador v. West 54 Liquors LLC

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:20-cv-05220
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Garcia Salvador v. West 54 Liquors, Judge Engelmayer directed the parties to seek court approval of their mediated settlement because the case involved the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Who this affects

The parties to the wage-and-hour case, including Cesar Augusto Garcia Salvador and the listed defendants, were required to seek court approval of their mediated settlement.

What happened

Cesar Augusto Garcia Salvador sued West 54 Liquors LLC and other defendants, and the parties told the court that mediation resolved all disputes.

Because the case involved the Fair Labor Standards Act, the court said the settlement might require court approval under federal appellate precedent.

Judge Engelmayer directed the parties to seek approval of their settlement by February 1, 2021; the order did not approve the settlement itself.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia Salvador v. West 54 Liquors LLC · No. 1:20-cv-05220
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Jan. 22, 2021

Background

The court was advised that the parties resolved all disputes through mediation. The plaintiff was Cesar Augusto Garcia Salvador, and the defendants were West 54 Liquors LLC, doing business as 10th Ave Wines & Liquors, Amany Awad, Lata Doe, and Bushara Doe.

Settlement Approval

The case arose, among other things, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing certain wage and hour matters. The court stated that the settlement agreement might be subject to court approval under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The opinion did not decide whether the settlement was fair or approve its terms.

Ruling

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer directed the parties to seek court approval of the settlement by February 1, 2021. The order did not state that approval was granted.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.