Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 25, 2021

S.J. v. New York City Department of Education

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:20-cv-01922
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In S.J. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Schofield added $1,388 in fees, raising the total award to $32,698.76 plus interest.

Who this affects

S.J., individually and on behalf of K.H., received an additional $1,388.00 in attorneys’ fees, and the New York City Department of Education was subject to the resulting judgment.

What happened

In S.J. v. New York City Department of Education, the court had previously awarded the plaintiff $30,728 in attorneys’ fees and $582.76 in costs, plus post-judgment interest.

The plaintiff requested another $2,934 for preparing objections to an earlier recommendation. The Department of Education objected and argued that the request should be substantially reduced or denied.

Judge Schofield awarded an additional $1,388 in attorneys’ fees. The court modified the award to $32,116 in fees and $582.76 in costs, for a total of $32,698.76 plus post-judgment interest, and directed the Clerk to enter judgment for the plaintiff.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
S.J. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:20-cv-01922
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Jan. 25, 2021

Background

The court had previously adopted, with modifications, a report and recommendation and awarded S.J. $30,728.00 in attorneys’ fees and $582.76 in costs, for a total of $31,310.76 plus post-judgment interest at the applicable statutory rate. S.J. then submitted a request for an additional $2,934.00 for attorney work connected with preparing objections to the report and recommendation.

Parties’ Positions

The New York City Department of Education objected to the additional request, arguing that the compensation should be substantially reduced or denied entirely. The court explained that fees may be awarded for hours that are not excessive, duplicative, or unnecessary. It also relied on its earlier decision to reduce by 50% the attorney hours billed for the federal litigation.

Ruling

The court found that the requested fees for preparing objections were excessive in light of the history of the fee litigation and that the time spent was unnecessarily high. It applied the same 50% reduction to the requested hours. It also excluded 0.3 hours each billed by Andrew Cuddy and Benjamin Kopp on January 13, 2021, for work concerning a potential appeal.

The court calculated the additional award as follows:

- Andrew Cuddy: 0.8 compensable hours at $360 per hour, totaling $288.00. - Benjamin Kopp: 5.25 compensable hours at $200 per hour, totaling $1,050.00. - Shobna Cuddy: 0.4 hours at $125 per hour, totaling $50.00.

The court therefore modified the earlier award to include an additional $1,388.00 in attorneys’ fees. The resulting award was $32,116.00 in attorneys’ fees and $582.76 in costs, for a total of $32,698.76 plus post-judgment interest. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment in favor of S.J.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.