Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 26, 2021

Brummett v. Capital One Bank National Association

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:21-cv-00604
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Brummett v. Capital One, Judge Furman ordered Trans Union to report whether the other defendants had been served and notify all parties.

Who this affects

The order directly affects Trans Union, LLC, which must report on service, notify the parties, and file proof of service. It also affects the remaining defendants and the plaintiff because the court is tracking whether they were served.

What happened

Brummett v. Capital One Bank (USA) National Association began in New York State court against Capital One, Trans Union, and Equifax. Trans Union removed the case to federal court after being served with the complaint and other papers.

The court said that defendants who were properly joined and served generally must independently consent to removal. Trans Union’s removal notice did not show that the other defendants had consented or say whether they had been served.

Judge Furman ordered Trans Union to update the court about service on the remaining defendants, file a letter about that status within thirty days of removal, and serve this order on all parties within two business days.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brummett v. Capital One Bank National Association · No. 1:21-cv-00604
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Jan. 26, 2021

Background

Benjamin A. Brummett filed the action in New York State court on November 30, 2020, against Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, Trans Union, LLC, and Equifax Information Services, LLC. Trans Union was served with the complaint, summons, and other papers on January 18, 2021. Trans Union removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on January 22, 2021.

Removal-consent requirement

The court explained that, when a case is moved from state court to federal court, all defendants who were properly joined and served generally must join in or consent to the removal. The court also noted an exception for a defendant who had not been served when the removal papers were filed.

Trans Union’s notice of removal did not indicate that any other defendant had consented. It also stated only that Trans Union was the only defendant in the case as of the notice’s date, without indicating whether the remaining defendants had been served.

Order

The court ordered Trans Union to keep the court informed promptly after learning that the remaining defendants had been served. In any event, no later than thirty days after removal, Trans Union had to file a letter stating the status of service on the remaining defendants. Trans Union was also ordered to serve a copy of the order on all parties and file proof of service within two business days. The order did not decide whether removal was ultimately proper or address the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.