Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 27, 2021

Monegro v. Telebrands Corp.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:20-cv-08555
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Monegro v. Telebrands Corp., Judge Broderick dismissed the claims without prejudice because Monegro failed to serve Telebrands or show good cause.

Who this affects

Frankie Monegro’s claims against Telebrands Corp.; the case was closed.

What happened

In Monegro v. Telebrands Corp., Frankie Monegro filed an action against Telebrands Corp. and obtained a summons. The opinion says Monegro did not file proof of service or take other steps to prosecute the case.

The court ordered Monegro to provide proof that Telebrands had been served or explain, with legal support, why the service deadline should be extended. Monegro did not comply with that order and did not show good cause for extending the deadline.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick dismissed Monegro’s claims against Telebrands Corp. without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) and directed the Clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Monegro v. Telebrands Corp. · No. 1:20-cv-08555
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Jan. 27, 2021

Background

Frankie Monegro filed this action against Telebrands Corp. on October 14, 2020, and obtained a summons on October 15, 2020. The opinion states that Monegro did not file an affidavit of service or take any other action to prosecute the case.

Service Requirement

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) generally requires service of the defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. If the plaintiff does not complete service, the court must dismiss the action without prejudice or order service within a specified time. If the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the service period for an appropriate time. The opinion explains that good cause generally requires exceptional circumstances beyond the plaintiff’s control.

On January 19, 2021, the court ordered Monegro to file an affidavit showing timely service or submit a short, legally supported letter explaining why the case should not be dismissed under Rule 4(m). The order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal. Monegro did not comply and did not demonstrate good cause for extending the service deadline.

Ruling

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered that Monegro’s claims against Telebrands Corp. be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 4(m). The Clerk was directed to close the case. The opinion does not decide the underlying merits of Monegro’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.