Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 28, 2021

TRB Acquisitions LLC v. Yedid

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:20-cv-00552
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Motion to DismissCivil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In TRB Acquisitions LLC v. Yedid, Judge Furman granted dismissal: the trade-secret claim ended with prejudice, while state claims could be refiled in state court.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs' federal trade-secret claim was dismissed with prejudice, and their state-law claims were dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court. Defendant Jack Yedid obtained dismissal of the amended complaint.

What happened

TRB Acquisitions LLC v. Yedid involved a motion to dismiss an amended complaint that included a federal trade-secret claim and state-law claims.

The court dismissed the federal trade-secret claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act with prejudice, meaning it could not be refiled in that case. It dismissed the state-law claims without prejudice to refiling them in state court.

Judge Furman also declined to give the plaintiffs another chance to amend their amended complaint, and the judgment states that the case was closed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
TRB Acquisitions LLC v. Yedid · No. 1:20-cv-00552
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Jan. 28, 2021

Background

The judgment concerns Defendant Jack Yedid's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' amended complaint. The complaint included TRB's claim under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act and additional state-law claims.

Rulings

The court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss. It dismissed TRB's Defend Trade Secrets Act claim with prejudice. It dismissed the state-law claims without prejudice to refiling them in state court.

The court also declined to grant Plaintiffs leave to amend their amended complaint. The judgment states that Plaintiffs did not request permission to amend or suggest that they had facts that would cure the problems with the federal trade-secret claim. It further states that Plaintiffs had already received permission to amend the original complaint and had been warned that they would not receive another opportunity to address the issues raised by the motion to dismiss.

Disposition

The judgment states that the case was closed. The case materials identify Judge Jesse Furman, while the judgment itself is signed by Clerk Ruby J. Krajick and a deputy clerk.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.