Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Jan. 28, 2021

Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Falcon &…

Full caption

Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. Falcon & Sons Corp.

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:20-cv-10113
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ArbitrationSummary JudgmentContract
In one sentence

In Drywall Tapers v. Falcon & Sons, Judge Furman confirmed the entire arbitration award and awarded the union attorneys’ fees and costs.

Who this affects

Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 and Falcon & Sons Corp.; the union received confirmation of the entire arbitration award and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.

What happened

Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Falcon & Sons Corp. Falcon did not oppose the petition or seek relief from the award after receiving the revised briefing schedule.

The court reviewed the petition and supporting materials even though Falcon did not respond. It found no genuine dispute requiring a trial and found no legal basis under the Federal Arbitration Act to cancel the award.

Judge Furman granted the union’s unopposed petition to confirm the entire award and awarded the union its requested attorneys’ fees and costs. The union was directed to submit a proposed judgment by February 4, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. Falcon &… · No. 1:20-cv-10113
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Jan. 28, 2021

Background

On December 2, 2020, the union filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award. The union served Falcon & Sons Corp. with the petition and supporting materials, but initially did not timely serve the first briefing schedule. The court issued a revised schedule to give Falcon a meaningful opportunity to respond, and the union served that revised schedule. Falcon’s opposition was due January 27, 2021. Falcon did not respond to the petition and did not otherwise seek relief from the award.

Court’s analysis

The court explained that an unopposed petition to confirm an arbitration award must still be reviewed. It treated the petition as similar to a motion for summary judgment, meaning a request for a decision based on the submitted materials when there is no genuine dispute requiring a trial. After reviewing the petition and supporting materials, the court found no genuine issue of material fact preventing judgment on all portions of the award. It also found that the arbitrator’s decision provided more than the minimally required justification for its result and that there was no basis under Section 10(a) of the Federal Arbitration Act to vacate, or cancel, the award.

Ruling

The court granted the union’s unopposed petition to confirm the entire award. It also awarded the union its requested attorneys’ fees and costs, finding that the union had shown that the time spent, rates charged, and litigation costs were reasonable and necessary. The union was directed to file a proposed judgment electronically by February 4, 2021. Judge Jesse M. Furman signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.