Greer v. Fox Corporation
- Laura Swain
- 1:20-cv-05484
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Greer v. Carlson, Judge Swain granted defendants’ dismissal motion for lack of jurisdiction but allowed Greer to amend.
Steven E. Greer and the defendants, including Tucker Carlson and Strasberg, were affected. The motion to dismiss was granted, but Greer was allowed to file a Second Amended Complaint.
What happened
In Steven E. Greer v. Tucker Carlson, et al., the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Greer’s lawsuit while allowing him to amend his complaint. No party objected to that recommendation.
The court agreed that it lacked authority to hear the case because the parties did not have different citizenship for diversity jurisdiction. It also agreed that Tucker Carlson and Strasberg could not be removed from the case because they were not necessary parties.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain adopted the recommendation in full, granted the motion to dismiss, and allowed Greer to file a Second Amended Complaint by March 1, 2021. If he did not file it on time, the court would enter judgment dismissing the action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
The detailed version
- Greer v. Fox Corporation · No. 1:20-cv-05484
- Laura Swain
- Jan. 28, 2021
Background
The court reviewed Magistrate Judge Aaron’s December 24, 2020, Report and Recommendation. The recommendation advised granting the moving defendants’ motion to dismiss but allowing Steven E. Greer to amend his complaint. No objections were filed.
Reasoning
Because no timely objection was made, the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. Judge Swain found no clear error and adopted the magistrate judge’s conclusions.
The court concluded that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction—the court’s legal authority to hear the case—because there was no diversity of citizenship between the parties. The court also adopted the conclusion that Tucker Carlson and Strasberg could not be severed from the action because they were not indispensable parties. The court further agreed that Greer should be allowed to amend because he was representing himself without a lawyer.
Order
The court adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. It granted the motion to dismiss but granted Greer leave to file a Second Amended Complaint by March 1, 2021. The amended complaint had to include all allegations on which Greer intended to rely and identify all parties against whom he wished to maintain the lawsuit. The court stated that failing to file a timely amended complaint would result in entry of judgment dismissing the action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further advance notice. The case remained referred to Magistrate Judge Aaron for general pretrial management.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.