Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 2, 2021

Saadeh v. Kagan

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:20-cv-01945
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In Saadeh v. Kagan, Judge Netburn ordered written submissions to determine damages claimed against the Estate of Irving Kagan.

Who this affects

Rafic Saadeh must submit evidence supporting his claimed damages. The Estate of Irving Kagan may respond and submit its own evidence; Michael Kagan, identified as the Estate’s administrator, must receive service of the order and Saadeh’s filing.

What happened

In Saadeh v. Kagan, the court set procedures for an inquiry into damages claimed by Rafic Saadeh against the Estate of Irving Kagan. The opinion does not explain the underlying claims or the Estate’s liability.

The court ordered Saadeh to file proposed factual findings and legal conclusions, with supporting affidavits and documents, within 30 days. The Estate may respond within 30 days after service and may submit its own proposed findings. The court also stated that it may decide the damages inquiry using written submissions alone, unless a party explains why a hearing with witnesses is needed.

Judge Sarah Netburn issued the order on February 2, 2021, after Judge Paul A. Engelmayer referred the case to her for the damages inquiry. The order directs the Clerk to mail a copy to the Estate through its administrator, Michael Kagan.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Saadeh v. Kagan · No. 1:20-cv-01945
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Feb. 2, 2021

Background

On January 29, 2021, Judge Paul A. Engelmayer referred the case to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn to conduct an inquiry into damages and prepare a report and recommendation concerning Rafic Saadeh’s damages claims against the Estate of Irving Kagan. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims, any liability determination, or the amount of damages sought.

Court’s Order

The court ordered Saadeh to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning all claimed damages and other monetary relief against the Estate within 30 days after the order’s entry. He must support the proposed factual findings with affidavits and other documentary evidence and cite supporting evidence for each finding. He must also mail the filing and the order to Michael Kagan, identified as the Estate’s administrator, at the administrator’s last known address.

The Estate may file a response within 30 days after service. Its response must address each proposed finding and conclusion, and the Estate may submit counter-findings and counter-conclusions supported by affidavits or other documentary evidence.

Possible Written Inquest

The court notified the parties that it may conduct the damages inquiry based solely on their written submissions. A party seeking an evidentiary hearing must explain why written submissions alone would be insufficient and describe the witnesses and evidence it would present. The Clerk was directed to mail a copy of the order to the Estate through Michael Kagan.

Disposition and Effect

This order establishes the procedure and deadlines for determining the damages claimed against the Estate. It does not state the amount of damages, resolve the underlying claims, or announce a final damages award. Judge Sarah Netburn signed the order on February 2, 2021.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.