Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 2, 2021

Del Aguila v. Newmark Solutions Corp.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:19-cv-07372
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Del Aguila v. Newmark Solutions Corp., Judge Abrams approved the revised settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

Edgar Del Aguila and the other plaintiffs, Newmark Solutions Corp. and the other defendants; the action is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk is directed to close the case.

What happened

In Del Aguila v. Newmark Solutions Corp., the parties submitted revisions to a settlement agreement. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

The court relied on its October 26 memorandum opinion and order and considered whether the revised settlement was fair and reasonable.

Judge Ronnie Abrams approved the settlement, dismissed the action with prejudice, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Del Aguila v. Newmark Solutions Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-07372
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Feb. 2, 2021

Background

The opinion concerns a settlement agreement in an action brought by Edgar Del Aguila and other plaintiffs against Newmark Solutions Corp. and other defendants. The parties made recent revisions to the agreement. The opinion does not provide the underlying claims or describe the revisions.

Court’s Analysis

The court relied on its October 26 memorandum opinion and order and concluded that the revised settlement agreement was fair and reasonable. The opinion cites Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015).

Ruling

Judge Ronnie Abrams approved the settlement agreement. The action was dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.