Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 4, 2021

Sierra v. Alma Realty Corp.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:19-cv-08455
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sierra v. Alma Realty Corp., Judge Liman scheduled a hearing to review the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement for fairness.

Who this affects

The parties to the Fair Labor Standards Act case, including plaintiff Cesar Sierra and defendants Alma Realty Corp. and the other named defendants, were affected by the scheduled settlement-approval hearing.

What happened

In Sierra v. Alma Realty Corp., the parties reached a settlement in a lawsuit brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law.

The court said that Second Circuit law requires it to review the settlement, including any proposed attorney-fee award, to ensure it is fair. The opinion did not approve or reject the settlement.

Judge Lewis J. Liman scheduled a telephone settlement-approval hearing for February 17, 2021, replacing the previously scheduled status conference, and required the plaintiff to attend.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sierra v. Alma Realty Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-08455
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Feb. 4, 2021

Background

The parties reached a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. The opinion does not describe the underlying wage claims or the settlement’s terms.

Court’s Action

The court stated that, under current Second Circuit law, it must scrutinize any settlement—including any proposed attorney-fee award—to ensure that it is fair. The court did not decide whether the settlement was fair or approve the settlement in this order.

The court ordered that a settlement-approval hearing would take place instead of the post-discovery status conference scheduled for February 17, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. The parties were directed to appear by telephone, and the plaintiff was directed to attend. The order instructed the parties to use the telephone number and access code provided in the opinion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.