Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 7, 2021

Serkez v. DOC

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-01000
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Serkez v. DOC, Judge McMahon ordered Joseph Serkez to pay $402 or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Joseph Serkez, whose action must be accompanied by either the required $402 payment or a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Serkez v. DOC, Joseph Serkez filed the action without paying the required fees or submitting an application to proceed without prepaying them.

The court gave Serkez 30 days to pay $402 or complete, sign, and submit the application. The court said the action would be dismissed if he did not comply, and no summons would issue at that time.

Judge McMahon also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Serkez v. DOC · No. 1:21-cv-01000
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Feb. 7, 2021

Background

Joseph Serkez brought this action without a lawyer. He submitted the complaint without paying the required fees and without an application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Order

The court explained that proceeding with a civil action requires either payment of $402—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or submission of a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court ordered Serkez, within 30 days of the order, to pay the $402 or complete, sign, and submit the attached application. If the court grants the application, Serkez may proceed without prepaying the fees.

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Serkez a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the action would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Serkez complied, and that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed time.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and therefore denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.