Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 9, 2021

Angeles v. Boker USA, Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:20-cv-10760
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Angeles v. Boker USA, Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after the parties reported a settlement in principle, subject to a restoration deadline.

Who this affects

The order affects Jenisa Angeles, Boker USA, Inc., and the people represented in the action. It discontinued the case based on the reported settlement in principle, subject to the restoration deadline.

What happened

In Angeles v. Boker USA, Inc., Jenisa Angeles told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court ordered the action discontinued without costs to either party and allowed either side to seek restoration of the case by March 11, 2021. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. All other dates and deadlines were postponed indefinitely.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Angeles v. Boker USA, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-10760
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Feb. 9, 2021

Background

Jenisa Angeles brought the action on behalf of himself and other similarly situated people against Boker USA, Inc. The court received a letter from Angeles stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by March 11, 2021. The order states that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also postponed all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.