Campodonico v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
- Andrew Krause
- 7:18-cv-08606
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Campodonico v. Wal-Mart, Judge Krause directed subpoenaed witnesses Phillippe and Burgado to join a conference about their depositions.
Non-party witnesses Samuel Phillippe and Dede Burgado, the parties’ lawyers, and the parties seeking the depositions.
What happened
Campodonico v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP involved two non-party witnesses who had not responded to subpoenas requiring deposition testimony.
The witnesses had been properly served, and the court had previously issued orders about their failure to comply. The court said continued noncompliance could lead to sanctions, including costs and attorney fees, and noted that the depositions could occur by telephone or video.
Judge Andrew E. Krause ordered the witnesses to join a February 18, 2021 telephone conference, directed defense counsel to serve them with the order and contact information for both sides’ lawyers, and required proof of service by February 17.
The detailed version
- Campodonico v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP · No. 7:18-cv-08606
- Andrew Krause
- Feb. 10, 2021
Background
At a December 21, 2020 status conference, the parties’ lawyers reported that they still had not contacted non-party witnesses Samuel Phillippe and Dede Burgado. The witnesses had been properly served with subpoenas for deposition testimony. The court had also issued orders on March 24, 2020, and November 19, 2020, concerning the subpoenas’ noncompliance.
The court warned that continued failure to follow its orders and the subpoenas could result in serious consequences. It explained that available sanctions could be used to encourage future compliance, compensate a party harmed by the noncompliance, or both. The court identified service costs and attorney fees for time spent on a failed deposition attempt as examples of possible sanctions.
Court’s Directions
The court noted that complying with the subpoenas would not require a substantial time commitment and could be done by telephone or video recording. It scheduled a telephone conference with Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause for February 18, 2021, at 2:00 p.m., and directed Mr. Phillippe and Ms. Burgado to call in to discuss the subpoenas. The court stated that participation in the conference might address the subjects for which the parties had sought their depositions.
The court also said the witnesses could contact either side’s lawyer to understand what was required and arrange a safe way to comply. It directed defense counsel to serve a copy of the order on both witnesses as promptly as possible, allowed service by mail at their last known addresses, and required counsel to provide telephone numbers and email addresses for the lawyers. Defense counsel had to file proof of service on the docket by February 17, 2021.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.