Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 11, 2021

Premnauth v. 450 Concord Avenue Corp.

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:19-cv-09077
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Premnauth v. 450 Concord Avenue Corp., Judge Netburn approved the parties’ fair and reasonable settlement and dismissed the Fair Labor Standards Act case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Ann Premnauth and 450 Concord Avenue Corp.; the approved settlement and dismissal with prejudice ended this action.

What happened

In Premnauth v. 450 Concord Avenue Corp., the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the Fair Labor Standards Act case and submitted their proposed settlement for court review.

The court reviewed the proposed settlement as required for this type of wage case. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s specific terms.

Judge Sarah Netburn found the settlement fair and reasonable, approved it, and dismissed the action with prejudice. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Premnauth v. 450 Concord Avenue Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-09077
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
Feb. 11, 2021

Background

This was a Fair Labor Standards Act case brought by Ann Premnauth against 450 Concord Avenue Corp. The parties agreed in principle to settle and submitted a proposed settlement for the court’s review. The matter had been referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn for all purposes based on the parties’ consent.

Court’s Ruling

After reviewing the proposed settlement under the required settlement-review procedure, the court determined that it was fair and reasonable. The court approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice, meaning the action could not be brought again. The clerk was directed to terminate the settlement-related filing at ECF No. 51 and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.