Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 16, 2021

Duarte v. Highland Light Steam laundry Company

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:21-cv-00990
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
8
EmploymentCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Duarte v. Highland Light Steam Laundry Company, Judge Stanton ordered an English complaint or translation within sixty days before screening could continue.

Who this affects

Sony Marisol Ortega Duarte was required to provide an English translation or an amended complaint in English within sixty days. The employment claims were not decided.

What happened

In Duarte v. Highland Light Steam Laundry Company, Sony Marisol Ortega Duarte brought the action without a lawyer and checked the form indicating a claim under the Family and Medical Leave Act. Her factual statement was written in Spanish, so the court could not review it.

The court gave Duarte permission to either refile the original complaint with an English translation or submit an amended complaint in English within sixty days. The court did not decide the merits of her claims, and no summons would issue at that time.

Judge Louis L. Stanton warned that failure to comply, without showing a good reason, could lead to dismissal for failure to follow a court order. The court also noted that a free legal clinic could provide assistance and translation services.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Duarte v. Highland Light Steam laundry Company · No. 1:21-cv-00990
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Feb. 16, 2021

Background

Plaintiff Sony Marisol Ortega Duarte brought this employment-related action without a lawyer. The opinion states that she used the court’s Employment Discrimination Complaint form and checked the box for claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. In the facts section, she referred to an attached statement, but that statement was written in Spanish.

The court had previously granted Duarte permission to proceed without paying the filing fee. Because she was proceeding under that permission, the court was required to screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The court explained that federal court proceedings must be conducted in English and that it could not review the factual allegations in Spanish.

Order

The court granted Duarte leave to either refile her original complaint with an English translation or file an amended complaint in English. She was required to submit one of those documents to the court’s Pro Se Intake Unit within sixty days of the order and label it with docket number 21-CV-0990 (LLS). The court attached an amended complaint form for employment discrimination.

The court did not reach the merits of Duarte’s employment claims. It also directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to her and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time.

Effect of the Order

If Duarte failed to comply within the allowed period and could not show good cause—that is, a legally sufficient reason for the delay—the court stated that the complaint would be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order. The court also identified the New York Legal Assistance Group’s Legal Clinic for Pro Se Litigants as a possible source of free legal and translation assistance. Judge Louis L. Stanton signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.