Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 19, 2021

Capolongo v. Brann

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:21-cv-01469
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Capolongo v. Brann, Judge McMahon ordered the pro se prisoner to pay filing fees or submit forms within 30 days.

Who this affects

Antonio Capolongo, a prisoner representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the specified forms for the action to proceed.

What happened

In Capolongo v. Brann, Antonio Capolongo filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to ask to proceed without paying them upfront.

The court gave Capolongo 30 days to pay $402 or submit a completed application and authorization allowing installment payments from his prison account. No summons would issue yet, and the court said the case would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that any appeal from this order could not proceed without advance payment because it would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Capolongo v. Brann · No. 1:21-cv-01469
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Feb. 19, 2021

Background

Antonio Capolongo, who was being held at the Vernon C. Bain Center, filed this civil action without a lawyer. He submitted the complaint without paying the required fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Order

The court directed Capolongo, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay $402 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee, or submit the required application and prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow the $350 filing fee to be deducted in installments from his prison trust fund account and would require submission of certified account statements for the previous six months. The administrative fee does not apply to a prisoner granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Capolongo and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. If Capolongo complied, the action would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and disposition

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, so permission to proceed without prepaying fees was denied for purposes of an appeal. The court also cautioned that certain dismissals of prisoner actions can count as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This order addressed filing requirements and did not reach the merits of Capolongo’s claims. Judge Colleen McMahon issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.