Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 19, 2021

Chirse v. Upstate Corr. Fac.

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-00059
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Chirse v. Upstate Corr. Fac., Judge McMahon transferred the incarcerated plaintiff’s constitutional-rights case to the Western District of New York for proper venue.

Who this affects

Devante Chirse’s § 1983 action was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Western District of New York; the transferee court must decide whether he may proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Chirse v. Upstate Corr. Fac., Devante Chirse, who is incarcerated and representing himself, sued under a federal civil-rights law, claiming that defendants violated his constitutional rights at Southport Correctional Facility.

The court ruled that the Southern District of New York was not the proper location because Chirse did not allege that a defendant lived there or that the relevant events occurred there. Southport is in Chemung County, which is in the Western District of New York.

Judge Colleen McMahon transferred the action to the Western District of New York, closed the case in the Southern District, and left the decision about proceeding without prepaying fees to the receiving court. The court also said that no summons would issue and denied fee-free status for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chirse v. Upstate Corr. Fac. · No. 1:21-cv-00059
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Feb. 19, 2021

Background

Devante Chirse, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims against state actors for violating federal constitutional rights. He alleged that the defendants violated his rights at Southport Correctional Facility in Pine City, New York. He named Upstate Correctional Facility as a defendant but did not allege facts showing that his rights were violated there.

Venue Analysis

The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1391, which identifies the federal districts where a civil action may be filed. The court explained that venue generally is proper where a defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred.

Chirse did not allege that any defendant resided in the Southern District of New York or that a substantial part of the relevant events occurred there. Because his claims arose at Southport, and Southport is in Chemung County in the Western District of New York, the court concluded that venue was proper in that district.

Ruling

Judge Colleen McMahon transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Chirse and record service. The Southern District court stated that the transferee court would decide whether Chirse could proceed without prepaying fees. No summons would issue from the Southern District, and the order closed the case there.

The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Chirse permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide whether Chirse’s constitutional-rights claims had merit.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.