Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 23, 2021

Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:18-cv-11386
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Spectrum Dynamics Medical v. General Electric, Judge Broderick approved redactions protecting confidential business information from a hearing transcript.

Who this affects

Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited, General Electric Company, and members of the public seeking access to the identified portions of the January 27, 2021 transcript.

What happened

Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited and General Electric Company jointly asked the court to redact portions of a January 27, 2021 hearing transcript. They said the transcript contained confidential trade-secret information and details about GE product development covered by their protective order.

The parties argued that disclosure could cause substantial competitive harm to either company. They asked for narrowly tailored redactions of specified transcript pages and said the information was not relevant to the court’s resolution of any issue.

The application was granted. The case metadata identifies Judge Vernon Broderick, while the filing is addressed to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker and bears an “APPLICATION GRANTED” notation dated February 23, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company · No. 1:18-cv-11386
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Feb. 23, 2021

Background

The document is a joint application, rather than a substantive opinion, concerning public access to a transcript of the parties’ January 27, 2021 appearance. Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited and General Electric Company asked the court to direct the court reporter to redact statements on specified transcript pages before the transcript was made publicly available.

Parties’ Position

The parties said the transcript contained confidential details about Spectrum’s trade secrets and GE’s product development. They characterized the information as competitively sensitive, proprietary, and designated “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the parties’ stipulated confidentiality and protective order. They argued that disclosure would create a substantial risk of harm to Spectrum or GE.

The parties also argued that the request was narrowly tailored and would not deprive the public of access to critical information because the material was not relevant to the court’s resolution of any issue. They relied on the presumption of public access to judicial documents and the exception for information whose disclosure could cause competitive injury.

Ruling

The document bears an “APPLICATION GRANTED” notation dated February 23, 2021. The filing is addressed to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker, while the supplied case metadata identifies Vernon Broderick as the judge. The available text does not include a separate written order explaining the ruling beyond the granted notation. The ruling permitted the requested redactions to the publicly available version of the transcript.

Effect

The ruling affects the parties’ confidential business information and the public’s access to the identified portions of the hearing transcript. It does not decide the parties’ underlying trade-secret or product-development disputes.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.