Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 1, 2021

Stubbs v. Orange County Jail Administration & Grievence Office

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-00659
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Stubbs v. Orange County Jail Administration & Grievence Office, Chief Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Stubbs failed to pay fees or submit required forms.

Who this affects

Cornelius Stubbs’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice because he did not submit the required filing forms or pay the filing fees. The order also denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

What happened

In Stubbs v. Orange County Jail Administration & Grievence Office, the court had ordered Cornelius Stubbs to submit forms requesting permission to proceed without paying filing fees, provide prisoner authorization, or pay the required $402 filing fees. The order warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal.

Stubbs did not submit the forms or pay the fees. The court therefore dismissed his complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Stubbs v. Orange County Jail Administration & Grievence Office · No. 1:21-cv-00659
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Mar. 1, 2021

Background

By an order dated January 26, 2021, the court directed Cornelius Stubbs to do one of three things within 30 days: submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee, submit prisoner authorization, or pay the $402 required to file a civil action. The court warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Court’s ruling

The court found that Stubbs had not submitted the application or prisoner authorization and had not paid the filing fees. It therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The order did not reach the merits of Stubbs’s claims.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Stubbs and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.