Shomo v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision…
Shomo v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and it's Executives
- Philip Halpern
- 7:21-cv-00128
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Shomo v. State of New York, Chief Judge McMahon ordered a corrected prisoner authorization or payment of fees within 30 days.
Jose J. Shomo was required to pay the fees or submit a corrected prisoner authorization within 30 days for the action to proceed. The defendants were not subject to a merits ruling in this order.
What happened
Jose J. Shomo, an incarcerated person representing himself, sued the State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and its executives. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees and a prisoner authorization, but the authorization listed $400 instead of the required $350 filing fee.
The court ordered Shomo, within 30 days, either to pay $402 in fees or submit a corrected prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow installment deductions of the $350 filing fee from his prison account. The court said the case would be processed if he complied and would be dismissed if he did not; no summons would issue at that time.
Chief Judge Colleen McMahon also denied fee-free status for any appeal, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims against the defendants.
The detailed version
- Shomo v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision… · No. 7:21-cv-00128
- Philip Halpern
- Feb. 26, 2021
Background
Jose J. Shomo, who was incarcerated at Fishkill Correctional Facility, brought this civil action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees and a prisoner authorization. The authorization allowed collection of $400 from his prison account, but the court explained that the required filing fee subject to installment collection was $350. The separate $52 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepayment.
Order
The court ordered Shomo, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the total $402 in fees or to complete and submit the attached corrected prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 21-CV-0128 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Shomo and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time.
The court stated that, if Shomo complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The order did not rule on the merits of Shomo’s claims against the defendants. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepayment of fees. The order further cautioned that a later dismissal for being frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim could count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Effect
This was an administrative and fee-related order at the start of the case, not a decision on the underlying claims. The order required action by Shomo before the case could proceed.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.