Rosado v. The French Paradox Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:20-cv-07788
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Rosado v. The French Paradox Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by March 28, 2021.
The plaintiff and defendants in the action, including the proposed similarly situated persons represented by the plaintiff.
What happened
In Rosado v. The French Paradox Inc., the court received notice that the parties had reached a settlement in principle covering all issues.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and allowed either side to ask to restore it to the court’s calendar by March 28, 2021.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Rosado v. The French Paradox Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-07788
- Vyskocil
- Feb. 26, 2021
Background
Diana M. Rosado brought the action individually and on behalf of other similarly situated persons against The French Paradox Inc., doing business as OCabanon, Armel Joly, and Alexandre Mur. The opinion states that a mediator informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle on all issues.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by March 28, 2021. The court further ordered that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms or approve a settlement agreement.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.