Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 2, 2021

Swinson v. City of New York

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:20-cv-00994
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
10
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Swinson v. City of New York, Judge Abrams gave Randy Swinson one final chance to amend his complaint before possible dismissal for failing to prosecute.

Who this affects

Randy Swinson was given a final deadline to file a second amended complaint. The City of New York and the identified individuals, Captain John Hernandez and Keziah Eaddy, were affected because the proposed amended complaint was to name them as defendants; the court did not rule on the merits of Swinson's claims.

What happened

Randy Swinson sued the City of New York and other defendants, initially naming two officers as Jane Does. The City identified those officers as Captain John Hernandez and Keziah Eaddy, who allegedly held specified positions at the Manhattan Detention Complex between January and February 2020.

The court had ordered Swinson to file a second amended complaint naming the identified individuals, but he missed the original deadline and an extended deadline. The opinion states that Swinson is representing himself and is incarcerated.

Judge Ronnie Abrams gave Swinson one final opportunity to file the second amended complaint by April 2, 2021. The court did not dismiss the action in this order, but warned that failing to meet the deadline would result in dismissal for failure to prosecute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Swinson v. City of New York · No. 1:20-cv-00994
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Mar. 2, 2021

Background

Randy Swinson sued the City of New York and other defendants. He had intended to sue two officers whose names were initially unknown and who were therefore identified as Jane Does. Under an earlier court order, the City was required to identify those individuals and provide information for serving them with the lawsuit.

The City reported that the individuals were Captain John Hernandez and Ms. Keziah Eaddy, Community Coordinator. The City stated that, based on information available to it, Hernandez and Eaddy were employed as the Security Deputy Warden and Supervisor of Social Services, respectively, at the Manhattan Detention Complex between January and February 2020. The opinion does not specify which person held which position.

Missed Deadlines

After receiving the City's information, the court ordered Swinson to file a second amended complaint naming the newly identified defendants within 30 days. Swinson did not do so. On January 14, 2021, the court extended the deadline to February 15, 2021, but Swinson still did not file the complaint.

Ruling

Judge Ronnie Abrams gave Swinson one final opportunity to file a second amended complaint naming the individuals identified by the City. The deadline was April 2, 2021. The court warned that failure to file by that date would result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). This order itself did not dismiss the action.

The court attached a second-amended-complaint form and the City's October 28, 2020 letter. It explained that any second amended complaint would replace, rather than supplement, the original and earlier amended complaints. If Swinson filed one, the court would screen it and, if necessary, ask the newly identified defendants to waive service or direct that they be served.

The authoritative version

Read the full 10-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.