Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 3, 2021

Griffin v. Annucci

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:18-cv-10405
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Griffin v. Annucci, Judge Karas ordered service on Dr. Dana Gage and denied Griffin permission to appeal without paying fees.

Who this affects

Rudolph W. Griffin, Dr. Dana Gage, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service. The order directed service on Dr. Gage and did not resolve Griffin’s underlying claims.

What happened

In Griffin v. Annucci, Rudolph W. Griffin, who was incarcerated, brought a civil-rights lawsuit without a lawyer under a federal law allowing claims against state officials. He alleged that defendants violated his constitutional rights while he was held at Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

Because Griffin had permission to proceed without paying the filing fee up front, the court directed the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to prepare and carry out service on Dr. Dana Gage. Griffin was also told to notify the court if his address changed.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas did not decide whether Griffin’s allegations were true or whether his claims would succeed. The court ordered the Clerk to send the service materials and denied Griffin permission to appeal this order without paying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Griffin v. Annucci · No. 7:18-cv-10405
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Mar. 3, 2021

Background

Rudolph W. Griffin, who was incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility, filed this lawsuit without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that permits claims for constitutional violations by state officials. He alleged that defendants violated his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated at Sing Sing Correctional Facility. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without paying the filing fee up front.

Service of Process

The court explained that a plaintiff who has permission to proceed without paying the filing fee up front may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The order directed the Clerk of Court to complete a Marshals Service process form for Dr. Dana Gage, issue a summons, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve Gage. Griffin was responsible for notifying the court in writing if his address changed, and the court stated that the case could be dismissed if he failed to do so.

Disposition

This was an order concerning service, not a decision on the merits of Griffin’s constitutional claims. The court directed the Clerk of Court to mail Griffin a copy of the order and an information package, and to deliver the service materials for Dr. Gage to the Marshals Service. Judge Kenneth M. Karas also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied Griffin permission to appeal without paying fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.