Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 10, 2021

Sawicki v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:21-cv-02093
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSocial SecurityPro Se
In one sentence

In Sawicki v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge McMahon ordered Michael Sawicki to pay fees or submit an application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Michael Sawicki was required within 30 days to pay $402 or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment of fees. The action would be dismissed if he did not comply, and no summons would issue at that time.

What happened

In Sawicki v. Commissioner of Social Security, Michael Sawicki filed the case without paying the required fees or submitting an application to proceed without prepayment of fees.

The court gave Sawicki 30 days to pay $402 or submit a signed application. No summons would issue yet, and the court said the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that an appeal from this order would not qualify for proceeding without prepayment of fees because it would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sawicki v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:21-cv-02093
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Mar. 10, 2021

Background

Michael Sawicki filed this action without a lawyer. He did not pay the required filing and administrative fees and did not submit an application asking to proceed without prepayment of fees.

Order

The court stated that proceeding with a civil action required either payment of $402—$350 for the filing fee and $52 for the administrative fee—or a signed application to proceed without prepayment under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The court ordered Sawicki, within 30 days, to pay the fees or submit the attached application, labeled with docket number 21-CV-2093 (CM). If the application were granted, he could proceed without paying the fees in advance.

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Sawicki and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures if Sawicki complied, but the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time.

Appeal ruling

Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied permission to proceed without prepayment of fees for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.