Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 11, 2021

Bennett v. Dill

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-02068
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Bennett v. Dill, Judge McMahon transferred Bennett’s civil-confinement challenge to the Eastern District of New York.

Who this affects

Anthony Bennett’s federal challenge to his New York state civil-confinement order was transferred to the Eastern District of New York; the constitutional issue was left undecided.

What happened

In Bennett v. Dill, Anthony Bennett, who was representing himself, challenged under federal habeas law a New York state court order requiring his civil confinement.

The court transferred the case to the Eastern District of New York because the order was issued in Queens County, which is in that district. The court closed the case in the Southern District of New York without deciding whether Bennett’s confinement was constitutional.

Judge Colleen McMahon also declined to issue a certificate allowing an appeal and denied fee-free status for any appeal, while leaving the question of proceeding without paying filing fees to the receiving court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bennett v. Dill · No. 1:21-cv-02068
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Mar. 11, 2021

Background

Anthony Bennett, who was representing himself and was committed to the Central New York Psychiatric Center, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. That law permits a person held under a state-court judgment or order to seek federal review. Bennett challenged the constitutionality of a March 1, 2016, New York Supreme Court order directing his civil confinement.

Transfer

The court did not decide whether the confinement order was constitutional. Instead, it transferred the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which allows transfer to another federal district in the interests of justice. The court determined that Queens County, where the state-court order was issued, is in the Eastern District of New York. It directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action there and closed the case in the Southern District of New York.

Other rulings

The court stated that the Eastern District of New York would decide whether Bennett could proceed without paying fees. Because Bennett had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied, the court declined to issue a certificate of appealability, which is required for an appeal in this type of case. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

Disposition

The action was transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and the Southern District of New York case was closed. Judge Colleen McMahon did not reach the merits of Bennett’s constitutional challenge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.