Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 15, 2021

Goodridge v. United States

Judge
Denise Cote
Docket
1:16-cv-04477
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Goodridge v. United States, Judge Cote ordered the parties to confer and file a joint letter after an appellate remand.

Who this affects

Mark Goodridge and the United States, through their parties and attorneys, were required to confer and submit a joint letter addressing further proceedings.

What happened

In Goodridge v. United States, the court addressed what should happen after the Second Circuit vacated an earlier order denying Mark Goodridge’s petition challenging his sentence.

The court ordered the parties to discuss the Second Circuit’s decision and whether further proceedings were needed. It also required them to submit a joint letter with their recommendations by April 5, 2021.

Judge Denise Cote issued this order on March 15, 2021. The order did not decide the petition’s underlying issues or state what further proceedings would occur.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Goodridge v. United States · No. 1:16-cv-04477
Judge
Denise Cote
Date
Mar. 15, 2021

Background

Mark Goodridge petitioned under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. On August 25, 2016, the court denied that petition. On January 20, 2021, the Second Circuit vacated the 2016 order in light of its decision in United States v. Barrett, 937 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2019), and sent the matter back to the district court for further proceedings. The Second Circuit’s mandate issued on March 15, 2021.

Order

The court ordered the parties to confer about the implications of the Second Circuit’s order and whether further proceedings were necessary. It further ordered the parties to submit a joint letter by April 5, 2021, stating their recommendations about the need for further proceedings.

Disposition

Judge Denise Cote issued a case-management order requiring consultation and a joint filing. The order did not resolve the underlying sentence challenge or specify the further proceedings that would follow.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.