Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 15, 2021

Morales v. Department of Corrections

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:20-cv-10126
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

Morales v. Department of Corrections: Judge Aaron ordered service of Morales’s COVID-19 protection lawsuit on specified jail officials.

Who this affects

Jonathon Morales; Patricia Yang; Margaret Egan; Commissioner Cynthia Brann; and the New York City Department of Correction and New York City Law Department for purposes of service and notice.

What happened

In Jonathon Morales v. Department of Corrections et al., Jonathon Morales, who is incarcerated at the Vernon C. Bain Center, sued under a federal civil-rights law without a lawyer. He alleges that jail officials are failing to protect him from contracting COVID-19.

The court had allowed Morales to proceed without prepaying court fees and had received his Second Amended Complaint. The order directs service on Patricia Yang and Margaret Egan and asks Commissioner Cynthia Brann to waive service of the summons.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron ordered the Clerk of Court to issue summonses, prepare service forms, and send the necessary papers to the U.S. Marshals Service. The order also extends the service deadline for Yang and Egan until 90 days after their summonses are issued and warns Morales to report any address change.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Morales v. Department of Corrections · No. 1:20-cv-10126
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Mar. 15, 2021

Background

Jonathon Morales, who is incarcerated at the Vernon C. Bain Center, filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that jail officials are failing to protect him from contracting COVID-19. Morales originally filed his complaint with 49 other detainees, but the court later separated the matters into individual civil actions. Morales is the only plaintiff in this action.

The court previously allowed Morales to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. Morales then filed a Second Amended Complaint on March 9, 2021.

Order

The order directs service of the Second Amended Complaint on Patricia Yang and Margaret Egan. Because Morales was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court stated that he may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

The Clerk of Court must issue summonses for Yang and Egan, complete U.S. Marshals Service process forms with their addresses, and deliver the required papers to the Marshals Service. The court extends the time to serve Yang and Egan until 90 days after summonses are issued for them. If service is not completed within that period, the order states that Morales should request an extension of time.

The court also directs the Clerk to notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department and requests that Commissioner Cynthia Brann waive service of summons. The order warns Morales that he must notify the court in writing if his address changes and that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Disposition and Significance

This is an order concerning service of process—the formal delivery of the lawsuit to defendants—not a decision on whether Morales’s COVID-19 allegations are legally or factually correct. Judge Stewart D. Aaron ordered the specified service steps and requested Brann’s waiver of service. The opinion does not state a final ruling on the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.