Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 18, 2021

Petroceli v. FBI Buffalo Division Field Office

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-01205
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Petroceli v. FBI Buffalo Division Field Office, Judge McMahon ordered a pro se plaintiff to pay fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

The order affects Domingos Lugao Petroceli, who must either pay the required fees or submit an adequate amended application within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Domingos Lugao Petroceli v. FBI Buffalo Division Field Office, et al., the plaintiff asked to proceed without paying the court’s filing fees. He filed an application for that permission, but left most questions unanswered, so the court could not determine whether he was unable to pay.

The court ordered Petroceli, within 30 days, either to pay $402 in fees or submit a signed, amended application explaining why he could not pay. The court did not issue a summons at that time, and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying appeal fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Petroceli v. FBI Buffalo Division Field Office · No. 1:21-cv-01205
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Mar. 18, 2021

Background

Domingos Lugao Petroceli brought the action without a lawyer. To begin a civil case in the Southern District of New York, a plaintiff must either pay $402 in fees or apply to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), meaning without paying the filing fees in advance.

Petroceli submitted an IFP application, but the court found that his answers did not show that he was unable to pay. He had left most of the application’s questions unanswered, preventing the court from determining his ability to pay.

Order

The court directed Petroceli, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $402 filing and administrative fees or submit an amended IFP application. The amended application had to identify docket number 21-CV-1205 (CM) and provide facts showing that he could not pay. The court stated that, if it granted the amended application, Petroceli could proceed without prepaying the fees.

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Petroceli and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The order stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Petroceli complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed time.

Appeal ruling

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.