Petroceli v. FBI Buffalo Division Field Office
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:21-cv-01205
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Petroceli v. FBI Buffalo Division Field Office, Judge McMahon ordered a pro se plaintiff to pay fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepayment.
The order affects Domingos Lugao Petroceli, who must either pay the required fees or submit an adequate amended application within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.
What happened
In Domingos Lugao Petroceli v. FBI Buffalo Division Field Office, et al., the plaintiff asked to proceed without paying the court’s filing fees. He filed an application for that permission, but left most questions unanswered, so the court could not determine whether he was unable to pay.
The court ordered Petroceli, within 30 days, either to pay $402 in fees or submit a signed, amended application explaining why he could not pay. The court did not issue a summons at that time, and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.
Chief Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying appeal fees.
The detailed version
- Petroceli v. FBI Buffalo Division Field Office · No. 1:21-cv-01205
- Colleen McMahon
- Mar. 18, 2021
Background
Domingos Lugao Petroceli brought the action without a lawyer. To begin a civil case in the Southern District of New York, a plaintiff must either pay $402 in fees or apply to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), meaning without paying the filing fees in advance.
Petroceli submitted an IFP application, but the court found that his answers did not show that he was unable to pay. He had left most of the application’s questions unanswered, preventing the court from determining his ability to pay.
Order
The court directed Petroceli, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $402 filing and administrative fees or submit an amended IFP application. The amended application had to identify docket number 21-CV-1205 (CM) and provide facts showing that he could not pay. The court stated that, if it granted the amended application, Petroceli could proceed without prepaying the fees.
The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Petroceli and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The order stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Petroceli complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed time.
Appeal ruling
Chief Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.