Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 23, 2021

Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:18-cv-11386
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company, Judge Parker granted the parties’ request to redact confidential information from a hearing transcript.

Who this affects

Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited, General Electric Company, and the other parties and non-party identified in the filing were affected by the order permitting redactions to the transcript.

What happened

Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited and General Electric Company jointly asked the court to redact parts of a transcript from their February 25, 2021 hearing. They said the transcript contained confidential product-development information and alleged trade-secret details.

The parties argued that disclosure could cause substantial competitive harm and that the information was protected under their confidentiality order. They also said the requested redactions were limited and would not block public access to important information.

Judge Parker granted the application. The requested redactions concerned pages 6–8, 10, 16–17, 21, 25–34, and 37 of the transcript.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company · No. 1:18-cv-11386
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Mar. 23, 2021

Background

Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited and General Electric Company jointly requested redactions to Document 200, the transcript of the parties’ appearance before Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on February 25, 2021. The request was made under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(e), the judge’s individual practice rules, and the parties’ stipulated confidentiality and protective order.

The requested redactions covered pages 6–8, 10, 16–17, 21, 25–34, and 37. The parties stated that the transcript discussed GE’s development of a product that was not publicly available and confidential details of Spectrum’s alleged trade secrets. They characterized the information as competitively sensitive and proprietary, and as “Highly Confidential — Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information under the protective order.

Parties’ Arguments

The parties relied on the presumption of public access to judicial documents and the exception for information whose disclosure could harm a litigant’s competitive position. They argued that disclosure would pose a substantial risk of harm to GE or Spectrum, that the information was not relevant to the court’s resolution of any issue, and that the request was narrowly tailored. They also argued that the redactions would not deprive the public of access to critical information.

Ruling

The court granted the application. The ruling permitted the requested redactions in the publicly available version of the February 25, 2021 transcript. The document concerns access to court records and did not decide the underlying dispute between Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited and General Electric Company.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.