Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 24, 2021

Robinson v. Balanetre

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:21-cv-02071
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureCivil RightsPro Se
In one sentence

In Robinson v. Balanetre, Judge Halpern arranged service for Robinson’s COVID-19 protection lawsuit and extended the service deadline until 90 days after summonses issue.

Who this affects

Randolph Robinson, Delta Balanetre, Ronda Murray, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Robinson v. Balanetre, Randolph Robinson, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, alleges that Delta Balanetre and Ronda Murray failed to protect him from contracting COVID-19. He brings the action under a federal civil-rights law.

The court had allowed Robinson to proceed without paying the filing fee upfront. It extended the deadline for serving the defendants until 90 days after the summonses are issued and directed the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service to prepare and carry out service.

Judge Philip M. Halpern also directed the Clerk to mail Robinson an information package. Robinson must notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court stated that it may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Robinson v. Balanetre · No. 7:21-cv-02071
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Mar. 24, 2021

Background

Randolph Robinson, who is incarcerated at Otisville Correctional Facility and is representing himself, filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that Superintendent Delta Balanetre and Nurse Administrator Ronda Murray failed to protect him from contracting COVID-19. The opinion states that the court had already granted Robinson permission to proceed without paying the filing fee upfront.

Service of Process

Because Robinson was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court explained that he could rely on the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court extended the time for service until 90 days after the summonses are issued. It stated that, if service is not completed within that period, Robinson should request an extension of time.

The Clerk of Court was directed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue the summonses, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve Balanetre and Murray. The Clerk was also directed to mail Robinson a copy of the order and an information package.

Other Requirement and Disposition

Robinson must notify the court in writing if his address changes. The court stated that it may dismiss the action if he fails to do so. Judge Philip M. Halpern’s order addresses filing-fee status and service arrangements; the opinion text does not state a ruling on whether the defendants failed to protect Robinson from COVID-19.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.