Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 24, 2021

Greathouse v. Vasquez

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:20-cv-08748
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Greathouse v. Vasquez, Judge Netburn ordered federal marshals to serve Vasquez through his designated New York Police Department agent.

Who this affects

Leon Greathouse and defendant Vasquez; the order arranged service on Vasquez through his designated New York City Police Department agent.

What happened

Greathouse v. Vasquez concerns Leon Greathouse’s claims that he was unlawfully arrested and prosecuted in a murder case that was later dismissed. The opinion states that Greathouse sued under a federal civil-rights law and was proceeding without a lawyer.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to tell the U.S. Marshals Service to serve defendant Vasquez through the New York City Police Department’s Deputy Commissioner for Legal Matters, whom Vasquez had designated to accept service. The Marshals Service was directed to file proof of service by April 23, 2021, and the Clerk was directed to mail the order to Greathouse.

Judge Sarah Netburn issued this service order. It addressed how Vasquez should be served and did not decide whether Greathouse’s arrest or prosecution claims were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Greathouse v. Vasquez · No. 1:20-cv-08748
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Mar. 24, 2021

Background

Leon Greathouse alleged that he was unlawfully arrested and arraigned on a second-degree murder charge on or about June 12, 2000. He further alleged that, while incarcerated on two later, unrelated criminal convictions, he was brought to Manhattan Criminal Court several times for appearances in the murder case. According to the opinion, the murder case was dismissed on October 19, 2017.

The complaint was filed on October 19, 2020. The opinion states that, read broadly, the complaint asserted false-arrest and malicious-prosecution claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows certain civil-rights claims against state or local officials. Greathouse was proceeding without a lawyer and was entitled to have the U.S. Marshals Service carry out service of process.

Service issue

On February 11, 2021, the court directed the City of New York’s Law Department either to accept service for defendant Freddie Vasquez or to locate Vasquez’s last known address. The Law Department reported that it located Vasquez and that he no longer lived within the 100-mile area relevant to the requested method of service. It also reported that Vasquez had designated the New York City Police Department’s Deputy Commissioner of Legal Services as his agent to accept service on his behalf.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to inform the U.S. Marshals Service to serve defendant Vasquez at the New York City Police Department address provided by the Law Department. The Marshals Service was directed to file proof of service on the docket no later than April 23, 2021. The Clerk was also directed to mail a copy of the order to Greathouse.

This was a procedural order about service of process. The court did not rule on the merits of Greathouse’s false-arrest, malicious-prosecution, or other claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.