Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 24, 2021

McIver v. Department of Social Services

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-00783
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

McIver v. Department of Social Services: Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice because McIver neither paid the filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed without payment.

Who this affects

The plaintiff's complaint was dismissed without prejudice because the plaintiff neither paid the filing fee nor submitted the required application to proceed without paying fees. The plaintiff was also denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

What happened

In McIver v. Department of Social Services, the court had ordered the plaintiff to submit a completed application to proceed without paying court fees or pay the $402 filing fee within 30 days. The order warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal.

The plaintiff did neither: no application was filed, and the filing fee was not paid. The opinion does not address the underlying claims.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice. She also denied the plaintiff permission to appeal without paying fees, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McIver v. Department of Social Services · No. 1:21-cv-00783
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Mar. 24, 2021

Background

The court had previously ordered Plaintiff to do one of two things within 30 days: submit a completed application to proceed without paying court fees, or pay the $402 required filing fee for a civil action. The earlier order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Plaintiff did not submit the application and did not pay the filing fee.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. Because the dismissal was without prejudice, the opinion does not state that refiling is barred. The court did not decide the merits of Plaintiff’s underlying claims.

Appeal-fee ruling

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied Plaintiff permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.