Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 26, 2021

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Skelley

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:18-cv-08803
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
SecuritiesCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Securities and Exchange Commission v. Skelley, Judge Schofield adopted the recommended monetary awards after a default judgment against William C. Skelley.

Who this affects

The Securities and Exchange Commission received the monetary judgment. William C. Skelley was ordered to pay the specified disgorgement, interest, and civil penalties within fourteen days after entry of the order, plus post-judgment interest on delinquent amounts.

What happened

In Securities and Exchange Commission v. Skelley, the court had already entered a default judgment against William C. Skelley and sent the question of monetary remedies to a magistrate judge.

The court awarded the Securities and Exchange Commission $1,073,746.65 in disgorgement, $288,018.98 in prejudgment interest, and $1,073,746.65 in civil penalties. Skelley was ordered to pay within fourteen days after the order was entered, with post-judgment interest on late amounts.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation after finding no clear error and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Skelley · No. 1:18-cv-08803
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Mar. 26, 2021

Background

A July 8, 2019 default judgment had been entered against Defendant William C. Skelley. The Securities and Exchange Commission’s request for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty was then referred to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman for a post-default judgment hearing and recommendation.

Judge Freeman issued a Report and Recommendation on February 25, 2021. She recommended awarding the SEC $1,073,746.65 in disgorgement of Skelley’s ill-gotten gains; $184,655.27 in prejudgment interest for the period from December 31, 2013, through May 31, 2019, plus additional interest calculated on the combined amount of $1,258,401.92 for the period from June 1, 2019, through the date judgment was entered; and $1,073,746.65 in third-tier civil penalties. The Report was emailed to Skelley on February 26, 2021, and no timely objections were filed.

Court’s Review

When no timely objection is made to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the district court reviews the record for clear error before accepting it. Judge Lorna G. Schofield found no clear error in the recommendations concerning disgorgement, prejudgment interest, or civil penalties.

Disposition

The court adopted the Report and awarded the SEC:

- $1,073,746.65 in disgorgement; - $184,655.27 in prejudgment interest covering December 31, 2013, through May 31, 2019; - $103,363.71 in additional prejudgment interest covering June 1, 2019, through the date of entry of judgment; and - $1,073,746.65 in third-tier civil penalties.

The order required Skelley to pay these amounts within fourteen days after entry of the order. The SEC could seek civil contempt or use other legally authorized collection procedures after that fourteen-day period. Skelley also had to pay post-judgment interest on delinquent amounts under 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.