Garra v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
- Andrew Carter
- 1:17-cv-01293
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Garra v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, Judge Carter adopted Judge Netburn’s recommendation and granted enforcement of the settlement agreement.
The ruling affects Daniel Garra and the other plaintiffs, and Metro-North Commuter Railroad, by enforcing the settlement agreement against the defendant’s motion.
What happened
In Garra v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, the court reviewed Judge Netburn’s report and recommendation concerning the defendant’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement.
The court found no clear error in the record and adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety.
Judge Andrew Carter’s court granted Metro-North’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement.
The detailed version
- Garra v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad · No. 1:17-cv-01293
- Andrew Carter
- Mar. 29, 2021
Background
The plaintiffs are Daniel Garra and others, and the defendant is Metro-North Commuter Railroad. The judgment concerns Metro-North’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement.
Court’s Review
The court reviewed Judge Netburn’s report and recommendation. It applied the standard stating that a recommendation should be adopted when there is no clear error on the face of the record.
Ruling
The court concluded that the record contained no clear error, adopted Judge Netburn’s report and recommendation in its entirety, and granted the defendant’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.