Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 30, 2021

Jones v. The State of New York

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:16-cv-07109
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Jones v. Superintendent: Judge Briccetti denied Jones’s petition challenging his state conviction as filed too late.

Who this affects

Devin Lee Jones’s federal petition challenging his state conviction was denied as untimely; the case was closed, and he was not granted a certificate of appealability or permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

What happened

Devin Lee Jones v. Superintendent of Wende Correctional Facility concerned Jones’s petition asking a federal court to review his state conviction. The court adopted Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison’s recommendation that the petition was filed after the deadline.

The court found that the one-year federal deadline began on December 16, 2014, and expired on July 6, 2016. Jones filed his petition on August 31, 2016. The court also found that he had not shown extraordinary circumstances supporting an extension of the deadline or new, compelling evidence of actual innocence.

Judge Briccetti denied the petition, adopted the recommendation in full, entered judgment, and closed the case. The court also declined to issue a certificate allowing an appeal and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jones v. The State of New York · No. 7:16-cv-07109
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Mar. 30, 2021

Background

Devin Lee Jones filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 asking the federal court to review his state-court conviction. Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison recommended dismissing the petition as time barred. Jones, who was representing himself, filed objections, principally arguing that extraordinary circumstances justified extending the filing deadline.

The state court conviction was entered on October 15, 2010, and Jones was sentenced on January 7, 2011. The state appellate court affirmed the conviction on July 31, 2013, and the New York Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal on September 17, 2014. Because Jones did not seek review in the United States Supreme Court, the federal court treated the conviction as final on December 16, 2014.

Federal filing deadline

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act generally gives a person one year to file a federal petition challenging a state conviction. The deadline can be paused while a properly filed state post-conviction application is pending. It can also be extended in limited circumstances when the petitioner diligently pursues the case and an extraordinary circumstance prevents timely filing.

Jones filed a motion to vacate the judgment on January 20, 2015, 35 days after the federal limitations period began. That motion paused the deadline. The motion was denied on April 16, 2015, and leave to appeal that denial was denied on August 10, 2015. The court concluded that Jones’s later request for permission to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals was not a properly filed application because the order was not appealable under New York law. It therefore did not pause the deadline. The limitations period expired on July 6, 2016, but Jones did not file this petition until August 31, 2016.

Court’s analysis

The court reviewed the recommendation and found no error. It concluded that Jones’s objections repeated arguments already made in his petition and did not identify extraordinary circumstances that prevented timely filing. Jones cited depression and anxiety, worsened by his grandmothers’ illnesses and deaths in 2013 and 2016. The court agreed with Judge Davison that Jones’s ability to submit articulate and well-researched filings showed that those conditions had not prevented him from filing the petition on time.

The court also rejected Jones’s argument that actual innocence excused the late filing. It found that he had provided no new, credible, or compelling evidence establishing factual innocence.

Disposition

Judge Briccetti adopted Magistrate Judge Davison’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety and denied the petition. The Clerk was instructed to enter judgment and close the case. The court declined to issue a certificate of appealability because Jones had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.