Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 30, 2021

Ramirez v. M.L. San Jose Enterprises, Corp.

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:19-cv-03429
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Ramirez v. M.L. San Jose Enterprises, Judge Schofield ordered the parties to file the executed settlement agreement by March 31, 2021.

Who this affects

The parties were required to file an executed version of the previously approved settlement agreement by March 31, 2021.

What happened

Ramirez v. M.L. San Jose Enterprises concerns a settlement that the court had previously approved as fair and reasonable.

The parties did not file a signed copy of the approved settlement agreement by the March 29 deadline set in the earlier order.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered the parties to file the executed agreement by March 31, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ramirez v. M.L. San Jose Enterprises, Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-03429
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Mar. 30, 2021

Background

The court stated that an earlier order dated March 25, 2021, had approved the parties’ proposed settlement as fair and reasonable under the legal standard discussed in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. That earlier order directed the parties to file a signed version of the approved settlement agreement by March 29, 2021.

The parties had not filed the signed agreement by that deadline.

Ruling

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered the parties to file an executed version of the approved settlement agreement by March 31, 2021.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.