Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 1, 2021

Bon Worth, Inc. v. Runway 7 Fashions, Inc.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:17-cv-09712-PAE-BCM
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureBankruptcy
In one sentence

In BONWORTH, INC. v. RUNWAY 7 FASHIONS, INC., Judge Engelmayer ordered Runway 7 to explain why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Who this affects

BONWORTH, INC. faced possible dismissal for failure to prosecute after its lawyers withdrew and successor counsel did not appear. RUNWAY 7 FASHIONS, INC. was ordered to explain why the case should not be dismissed, potentially by filing a motion for default judgment.

What happened

BONWORTH, INC. v. RUNWAY 7 FASHIONS, INC. had been paused because of Bonworth’s bankruptcy proceedings. After Bonworth’s lawyers withdrew, no successor lawyer appeared, and the parties did not submit the required status report.

The court ordered Runway 7 to explain by April 12, 2021, why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Runway 7 could respond by properly filing a motion for default judgment. The order did not dismiss the case at that time.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer stated that failing to file a timely and proper motion for default judgment would result in dismissal of the case under Rule 41.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bon Worth, Inc. v. Runway 7 Fashions, Inc. · No. 1:17-cv-09712-PAE-BCM
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Apr. 1, 2021

Background

On February 19, 2021, Runway 7 notified the court that Bonworth’s bankruptcy proceedings were likely to conclude by March 17, 2021, which would lift the automatic stay in this case. The court directed the parties to file a joint status report about the bankruptcy proceedings and the next steps in the case by March 24, 2021.

Bonworth’s lawyers renewed their request to withdraw from the case on February 23, 2021. The court granted that request on February 24, 2021. Because Bonworth is a corporation and corporations cannot represent themselves in federal court, the court stated that it would consider a motion for default judgment from Runway 7 if successor counsel for Bonworth did not appear by March 10, 2021.

Order

The court did not receive the required status report by March 24, 2021. Successor counsel for Bonworth had not appeared, but Runway 7 had not filed a motion for default judgment.

The court ordered Runway 7 to show cause by April 12, 2021, meaning to explain why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court stated that Runway 7 could show cause by properly submitting a motion for default judgment under the court’s individual rules. The court further ordered that failure to submit a timely and proper motion for default judgment would result in dismissal of the case under Rule 41.

Disposition

The court issued an order to show cause; it did not dismiss the case in this order. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer set the April 12, 2021 deadline and identified the consequence of failing to file a proper and timely motion for default judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.