Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 1, 2021

Monegro v. Addison Farms, LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:20-cv-07680
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

Monegro v. Addison Farms, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the action after the parties reported a settlement in principle, subject to possible restoration by May 2, 2021.

Who this affects

Frankie Monegro, the people he sought to represent as similarly situated, and Addison Farms, LLC.

What happened

In Monegro v. Addison Farms, LLC, Frankie Monegro sued Addison Farms, LLC, on behalf of himself and others described as similarly situated. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

The parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application was made by May 2, 2021. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on April 1, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Monegro v. Addison Farms, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-07680
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Apr. 1, 2021

Background

Frankie Monegro brought the action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated against Addison Farms, LLC. The opinion does not state the underlying legal claims or the terms of the proposed settlement.

Court’s Action

The parties notified the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. Based on that notice, the court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. The order allowed an application to restore the action if made by May 2, 2021. It further stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be brought again.

Disposition

The court entered an order of dismissal and discontinued the action under the stated conditions. The opinion does not decide the merits of the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.