Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 2, 2021

Samaroo v. The Bank of New York Mellon

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:21-cv-02441
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Samaroo v. The Bank of New York Mellon, Judge Torres ordered service through the Marshals Service and extended the service deadline for Samaroo’s lawsuit.

Who this affects

Karamchand Samaroo, The Bank of New York Mellon, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service; the order sets up service of the lawsuit but does not decide Samaroo’s Sarbanes-Oxley claim.

What happened

Karamchand Samaroo sued The Bank of New York Mellon under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, alleging that his employer fired him after he reported misconduct. The court had allowed Samaroo to proceed without paying the filing fee.

Because Samaroo was proceeding without paying the filing fee, the court directed the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Analisa Torres ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summons, complete the service paperwork, and send the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order also told Samaroo to notify the court if his address changes and directed the clerk to mail him the order and an information package.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Samaroo v. The Bank of New York Mellon · No. 1:21-cv-02441
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Apr. 2, 2021

Background

Karamchand Samaroo filed a lawsuit against The Bank of New York Mellon under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A. He alleges that his employer fired him for reporting misconduct. The opinion addresses service of the lawsuit, not whether that allegation is legally valid.

The court had granted Samaroo permission to proceed without paying the filing fee. In such cases, federal law and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require the court to direct the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint when the plaintiff provides the information needed to identify the defendant.

Service Deadline

The usual deadline for serving a summons and complaint is 90 days after the complaint is filed. The court explained that Samaroo could not have served the papers before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered a summons. It therefore extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued. The court stated that Samaroo should request more time if service is not completed within that period.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons, complete the U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for The Bank of New York Mellon, and deliver the required papers to the Marshals Service so it can serve the defendant. The clerk was also directed to mail Samaroo a copy of the order and an information package.

The order requires Samaroo to notify the court in writing if his address changes and states that the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so. The court also encouraged people proceeding without lawyers to file documents by email or, if unable to use email, by mail or in person. Judge Analisa Torres signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.