Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 5, 2021

Mo-Kan Iron Workers Pension Fund v. Teligent, Inc.

Judge
Victor Marrero
Docket
1:19-cv-03354
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

Mo-Kan Iron Workers Pension Fund v. Teligent, Inc.: Judge Marrero granted Defendants’ request to restrict public access to two expert reports.

Who this affects

Teligent Inc. and Grenfell-Gardner obtained restricted public access to two expert reports, while the plaintiff retained access.

What happened

Mo-Kan Iron Workers Pension Fund v. Teligent, Inc. involved Defendants’ request to keep two expert reports from public view while allowing the plaintiff to access them.

The reports discussed Teligent’s confidential business information, including research and development and information from applications concerning generic drugs.

Judge Victor Marrero granted the request to file the two reports as restricted exhibits. The order did not restrict the plaintiff’s access.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mo-Kan Iron Workers Pension Fund v. Teligent, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-03354
Judge
Victor Marrero
Date
Apr. 5, 2021

Background

Defendants Teligent Inc. and Grenfell-Gardner asked the court for permission to file two expert reports as nonpublic documents in connection with their opposition to the plaintiff’s motion for class certification. The reports were identified as the expert report of Carl Seiden and the expert report of Maureen Chakraborty, Ph.D., and were to be filed as Exhibits C and D to Douglas Baumstein’s declaration.

The defendants said the reports described confidential Teligent business information, including product research and development and information from abbreviated new drug applications. They stated that they did not object to the plaintiff’s access to the reports and sought only to restrict access by the general public.

Ruling

The court granted the defendants’ request to file Exhibits C and D under seal. Judge Victor Marrero’s order did not state that the plaintiff would be denied access to those documents.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.