Ramirez v. M.L. San Jose Enterprises, Corp.
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:19-cv-03429
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Ramirez v. M.L. San Jose Enterprises, Judge Schofield directed the Clerk to close the case after approving the parties’ settlement.
The parties and any other people covered by the approved settlement; the opinion does not identify them or describe the settlement’s terms.
What happened
Ramirez v. M.L. San Jose Enterprises, Corp. involved Jose Ramirez, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, and the defendants. The opinion concerns the parties’ proposed settlement.
The court had approved the settlement as fair and reasonable in an earlier March 25, 2021, order. The parties then filed an executed settlement agreement on March 30, 2021.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield found that no issues remained and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
The detailed version
- Ramirez v. M.L. San Jose Enterprises, Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-03429
- Lorna Schofield
- Apr. 6, 2021
Background
Jose Ramirez brought the case individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against M.L. San Jose Enterprises, Corp. and other defendants. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or provide the settlement’s terms.
Settlement Approval
The court stated that an earlier order dated March 25, 2021, approved the parties’ proposed settlement as fair and reasonable under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206–07 (2d Cir. 2015). The parties filed an executed settlement agreement on March 30, 2021.
Ruling
Judge Lorna G. Schofield stated that no issues remained outstanding. The court directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.