Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 2, 2021

Vails v. C R Bard Incorporated

Judge
John Koeltl
Docket
1:21-cv-01707
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Vails v. C.R. Bard, Judge Koeltl stayed the case until July 2, 2021, while the parties pursued settlement and required a status report.

Who this affects

Eleanor L. Vails, C. R. Bard, Inc., and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.; the case and its discovery and pretrial deadlines were paused.

What happened

In Eleanor L. Vails v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al., the parties jointly asked the court to pause the case and its deadlines for 90 days while they continued settlement discussions.

The request concerned claims involving Bard inferior vena cava filters, which plaintiffs represented that they contend caused injuries. The parties said they had reached settlements in principle in many related cases but were still negotiating cases, including this one, involving plaintiffs who had opted out of a settlement.

Judge John G. Koeltl ordered that the case remain stayed until July 2, 2021. He also directed the parties to file a status report by then.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vails v. C R Bard Incorporated · No. 1:21-cv-01707
Judge
John Koeltl
Date
Apr. 2, 2021

Background

Plaintiff Eleanor L. Vails and defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. jointly submitted a letter requesting a temporary stay of the case and all upcoming deadlines. The letter said that Vails's counsel represented plaintiffs with cases involving claims that injuries arose from their use of Bard's inferior vena cava filters. It also said the parties had previously settled many related cases in the multidistrict litigation proceeding and were continuing settlement discussions concerning cases that had been remanded to district courts, including this action.

Requested stay

The parties asked the court to stay all activity, including discovery and pretrial deadlines, for 90 days. They said the stay would conserve their resources while they pursued settlement. They further requested an opportunity to file a joint status report if dismissal papers had not been filed within 90 days.

Ruling

The court stayed the case until July 2, 2021. The order directed the parties to file a status report by that date. The opinion does not state that the case was dismissed or that a settlement was completed.

Classification

This is a procedural order because it pauses the litigation to facilitate settlement discussions and does not decide the merits of Vails's claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.