Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 2, 2021

Fletcher v. Medgar Evers College

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:20-cv-04163
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
30
Civil ProcedureCivil Rights
In one sentence

In Fletcher v. Medgar Evers College, Judge Caproni approved a settlement, dismissed the case with prejudice, and required $27,000 in payments and student-speech training.

Who this affects

Sakia Fletcher, CUNY, Medgar Evers College, the named officials and Councilwoman Laurie Cumbo, the State of New York, and New York City were affected. Fletcher received settlement rights and released covered claims; the defendants avoided further litigation without admitting liability and CUNY assumed the specified training obligation.

What happened

Fletcher v. Medgar Evers College involved Sakia Fletcher’s claims against Medgar Evers College, the City University of New York, several officials, and Councilwoman Laurie Cumbo. The agreement says Fletcher alleged violations of federal and New York law, while the defendants denied wrongdoing and liability.

The parties agreed to resolve the case without a decision on the merits. Under the settlement, Fletcher would receive $10,000 from the State of New York on behalf of the City University of New York and $2,000 from New York City; $15,000 would be paid to her attorneys. The agreement also required training for certain Medgar Evers College successors about student speech and the First Amendment.

Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the settlement and dismissed the action and the claims against the defendants with prejudice. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement, and the agreement allowed Fletcher to seek reinstatement if required state or city approvals were not obtained within the stated period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fletcher v. Medgar Evers College · No. 1:20-cv-04163
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Apr. 2, 2021

Background

Sakia Fletcher sued Medgar Evers College, the City University of New York (CUNY), officials associated with the college and CUNY, and Councilwoman Laurie Cumbo. The settlement agreement states that Fletcher asserted claims under the United States and New York Constitutions and New York statutory and common law. The agreement also states that the defendants denied any wrongful conduct, liability, or violation of law.

The agreement treated the complaint, later related filings and proceedings, a disciplinary proceeding, requests for records under New York’s Freedom of Information Law, and related appeals as part of the “Action.” It also stated that CUNY was the proper institutional defendant because Medgar Evers College was allegedly not a legally separate entity. The agreement addressed the death of Johnathon P. Hardaway and the substitution of his successor for official-capacity claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d).

Settlement terms

The parties agreed to dismiss the Action and all claims that were or could have been asserted in it with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The agreement provided for a gross settlement of $27,000:

- The State of New York, on behalf of CUNY, would pay Fletcher $10,000 for damages claims. - The State of New York, on behalf of CUNY, would pay $15,000 to Cohen & Green, P.L.L.C., for attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. - New York City would pay Fletcher $2,000 for claims including damages, equitable and injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses.

The state and city payments were conditioned on approval by the appropriate officials and on Fletcher and her attorneys providing required documentation. The agreement also contained provisions concerning taxes, Medicare eligibility and payments, liens, setoffs, and possible interest on delayed state payments.

Training requirement

Within the time specified in the agreement, CUNY was required to train the officers appointed to succeed Rudolph Crew as Medgar Evers College president and Johnathon P. Hardaway as chief legal officer. The training concerned the First Amendment’s application to student speech at CUNY, including the prohibition on disciplining students at Medgar Evers College for exercising First Amendment rights. If successors were not installed within the stated period, interim officers were to receive the training.

Release and waiver

In exchange for the settlement payments and other consideration, Fletcher released the State of New York, CUNY, New York City, and covered agencies, officials, employees, and other released parties from broad categories of known and unknown claims through the date of the agreement. The release covered claims related to the Action and numerous potential federal, state, and local constitutional, statutory, employment, discrimination, retaliation, contract, and tort theories. The agreement preserved specified nonwaivable statutory protections, certain New York Military Law and Labor Law claims, unemployment benefit rights, and the right to participate in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission proceedings.

The agreement stated that neither side would be considered a prevailing party and that the settlement was not an admission of liability, a determination on the merits, or precedent in another case. It also stated that Fletcher had counsel and entered the agreement voluntarily.

Court’s action and disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the settlement and dismissed the Action with prejudice. The separate stipulation dismissed with prejudice the claims against Rudolph Crew, Félix V. Matos-Rodriguez, Alexis McLean, and Johnathon P. Hardaway. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. If required state or city approvals were not obtained within 120 days after Fletcher submitted the required documentation, the agreement allowed Fletcher to declare it void and apply to reinstate the Action against specified defendants within the stated deadlines. The court did not decide the merits of Fletcher’s underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 30-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.