Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 6, 2021

Miami Home LLC v. Salazar

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:20-cv-10011
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Miami Home LLC v. Salazar, Judge Oetken granted Salazar’s motion to stay the foreclosure action until May 1, 2021 under New York’s COVID-19 foreclosure law.

Who this affects

The ruling affected Manuel Salazar by pausing Miami Home LLC’s foreclosure action until May 1, 2021, and affected Miami Home LLC by preventing the action from proceeding during the stay.

What happened

In Miami Home LLC v. Salazar, Manuel Salazar asked the court to pause Miami Home LLC’s foreclosure action under New York’s COVID-19 Emergency Eviction and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2020.

Salazar submitted a hardship declaration. Miami Home LLC argued that Salazar’s long-standing default defeated the request and that the Act applied only to state-court foreclosures. The court rejected both arguments, finding that the Act covers qualifying federal foreclosure actions and that the company had not rebutted Salazar’s declaration.

The court granted Salazar’s motion and stayed the action until May 1, 2021. Judge J. Paul Oetken directed the Clerk of Court to close the motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Miami Home LLC v. Salazar · No. 7:20-cv-10011
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Apr. 6, 2021

Background

Miami Home LLC brought a foreclosure action against Manuel Salazar. On January 22, 2021, Salazar moved to stay, or pause, the action under New York’s COVID-19 Emergency Eviction and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2020. The Act requires courts to stay foreclosure actions involving residential real property when a judgment of sale has not been issued. If the mortgagor provides a hardship declaration to the court, the stay must last until May 1, 2021.

Salazar submitted a hardship declaration. Miami Home LLC did not provide evidence rebutting it. Instead, the company argued that Salazar had been in default since 2012. The court held that this did not contradict Salazar’s statement that his financial situation had worsened because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The court also noted that the Act protects mortgagors who had been in default for a long time, including in actions filed on or before March 7, 2020.

Court’s Analysis

The court rejected Miami Home LLC’s argument that the Act applies only to foreclosure actions in state court. It found no language in the Act limiting its application to state-court cases and noted that the Act’s exemptions did not include actions brought in federal court. The court reasoned that limiting the Act to state-court actions would conflict with its purpose of avoiding foreclosures involving people experiencing financial hardship during the pandemic. The court also cited other cases in the circuit that had stayed pending foreclosure cases under the Act.

Disposition

For these reasons, Judge J. Paul Oetken granted Salazar’s motion to stay the action until May 1, 2021. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the motion at Docket Number 13.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.