Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 6, 2021

Jackson v. The Fishkill Correctional Facility Staff and Supervisor…

Full caption

Jackson v. The Fishkill Correctional Facility Staff and Supervisor Superintendent and Assistants

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:21-cv-00991
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Jackson v. Fishkill Facility Staff, Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the prisoner three-strikes rule.

Who this affects

The ruling affected Ronald Jackson’s ability to proceed in this action without prepaying the filing fee. It dismissed his complaint without prejudice, while allowing him to begin a new action by paying the $350 filing fee. The opinion did not decide the merits of his allegation that correctional staff intercepted his mail.

What happened

In Ronald Jackson v. The Fishkill Correctional Facility Staff and Supervisor Superintendent and Assistants, Jackson filed a civil-rights case without paying the filing fee or asking to proceed without prepayment. The court treated the filing as a request to proceed without prepayment and noted that Jackson was incarcerated and representing himself.

The court found that Jackson had at least three earlier cases or appeals dismissed as frivolous or for failing to state a claim. It also found that his allegation that correctional staff intercepted his mail did not show an immediate danger of serious physical injury. Because of that, the court ruled that he could not proceed without prepaying the fee.

Judge McMahon dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the prisoner three-strikes rule. Jackson may start a new action by paying the entire $350 filing fee, but the court denied permission to appeal without prepaying the appeal fee and said an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jackson v. The Fishkill Correctional Facility Staff and Supervisor… · No. 1:21-cv-00991
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Apr. 6, 2021

Background

Ronald Jackson, who was incarcerated at Fishkill Correctional Facility, brought this action without a lawyer. He did not pay the filing fee or formally request permission to proceed without prepaying it. The court nevertheless treated the case as involving such a request. Jackson alleged that correctional staff at Fishkill had intercepted his mail.

Three-strikes rule

The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which generally prevents a prisoner from proceeding without prepaying filing fees after three or more prior federal actions or appeals were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failing to state a claim. The court independently reviewed Jackson’s litigation history and found at least three qualifying dismissals, including dismissals for failure to state a claim and as frivolous.

Section 1915(g) contains an exception when the prisoner is in immediate danger of serious physical injury. The court found that Jackson’s allegation about intercepted mail did not show that he was in such danger when he filed the complaint.

Ruling

Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Jackson and record service on the docket. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s three-strikes rule. Jackson may commence a new action by prepaying the entire $350 filing fee. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying the appeal fee. The opinion states that any new complaint would be reviewed under the separate prisoner-screening statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.