Garcia v. 120 MP, LLC
- James Oetken
- 1:18-cv-06408
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Garcia v. 120 MP, LLC, Judge Oetken approved the parties’ settlement and dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice.
The plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed with prejudice after the court approved the parties’ settlement agreement. The agreement also included attorney’s fees and costs.
What happened
In Garcia v. 120 MP, LLC, the court reconsidered an earlier decision based on arguments from the plaintiffs’ lawyer.
The court approved the parties’ settlement agreement, including the request for attorney’s fees and costs, as fair and reasonable.
Judge J. Paul Oetken dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
The detailed version
- Garcia v. 120 MP, LLC · No. 1:18-cv-06408
- James Oetken
- Apr. 7, 2021
Background
The plaintiffs’ counsel submitted arguments in a letter identified as Dkt. No. 73. Based on those arguments, the court reconsidered its earlier decision at Dkt. No. 70.
Settlement Approval
Upon reconsideration, the court approved the parties’ settlement agreement, including the request for attorney’s fees and costs. The court found the agreement fair and reasonable under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.
Disposition
Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the court dismissed the plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. It directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.